Powered By Blogger

Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Topping From The Bottom


I had one of my favorite discoveries thus far in the R&G rehearsal process just the other day when I discovered this weird new persona for Alfred; a gender-queer street smart bad ass drag queen doing what he has to do to get by. This runs contrary to my initial intention, and to Stoppard's script, but since we've cut all of the really explicit rape jokes and Alfred's exchange with Guildenstern, and also considering my physical size and the world of the play as my director has been shaping it... it makes the most sense. At first, I was interested in the idea of Alfred as a victim, someone who's been put through a lot, has probably been assaulted and is clearly used when necessary in a sexual way by the player. So I was interested in how that affects someone's physical state, you know when someone has been a victim of trauma it affects them in a certain way. Except I realized with Alfred, and remembered from people I've been close to the in the past who I know had gone through those kinds of experiences, it doesn't necessarily translate to weakness and in Alfred's case it's made him very tough and weirdly strong and resilient. I mean, just considering my physical size, I don't look like someone who takes a lot of shit when you remove my gentile personality from the equation. And neither does Alfred. Danielle is really interested in bringing this ongoing sense of menace and danger to the Players as a unit, and it's been really enjoyable exploring that with Alfred. And with the gender-queer aspect, Alfred wears the dresses and plays the women because he wants too and because he does it damn well, and when he gets down to business with the evil king in the dumb show, he really gets into it.

All of this power and toughness though is in spite of his intrinsically low status, arguably in the text as written Alfred is the lowest status character in the play. This kind of changes when you remove the rape element, and instead of Alfred being a smallish 14 or 15 year old as he would have been in Shakespeare's time and so might be traditionally played in a straight reading of Stoppard's text, he's me, a 6'2" 200 pound 23 year old dude, so I have to bring the truth of "what if I were this person" and not "what if this person in the text was me" does that distinction make any sense? I guess I mean I have to bring the character to myself, rather than vice versa. And I've been exploring that, and this new sense of physicality and having tons of fun with the costume (the full version of which I saw today and it's pretty great), and especially the physical comedy.

Which is a fairly efficient segway into the other thing I wanted to blog about tonight. As of tomorrow morning, every Thursday, Friday and Saturday morning at 9 AM I'll be reporting to movement class with Yo-el Cassell courtesy of Commonwealth Shakespeare Company. As you may now, Commonwealth in it's third or fourth year of offering an apprenticeship program where you give them a bunch of money and in return they give you training, farm you out to do a "selection of scenes on this theme" style show in the 'burbs and you understudy and/or play a spear carrier in their main stage production. This year, in addition to all that, their offering parts of their training to the public, which will include me. So I'll be in with the apprentices and whoever else responded to the Stagesource post and had $500 doing Alexander Technique, Grotowski, Laban (don't know who that is but I'll find out), dancing and generally getting sweaty early in the morning for the next month. I'm excited! Having not done a BFA, movement is a big gap in my training and I'm looking forward to filling it in, becoming a more rounded actor and of course blogging about it.

Briefly, before I sign off, progress has been made in the podcast front. I have a tentative partner in the venture, someone I'm very excited to be working with and hopefully we'll be recording some stuff in the next few weeks. Till then!

2 comments:

  1. Do you realize you've presented Alfred as an existential hero? I can't suggest you go read Being and Nothingness, so I looked for a short essay Sartre once published that outlines the arc of self-creation.

    Unfortunately, if you search Google for "sartre essay bad faith self deception freedom", you get about 26,200 results in0.59 seconds. Sigh. This one from Psychology Today is as good as the more scholarly expositions, and shorter:
    http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/hide-and-seek/201203/jean-paul-sartre-bad-faith.

    Sartre distinguishes self-creation from mauvais foi, bad faith, the stereotypical behaviors and self-deceptions that arise when people flee from their (inescapable) freedom to create our their essence.

    Rather than sinking into the helpless evasions of victimhood, Alfred siezes the freedom to create himself through the choices he makes, even when all options seem unbearable.

    Sartre spends hundreds of pages arguing for a philosophical basis for human freedom. He has to start all the way beck with our existence preceding our essence. We're here, and we are stuck with creating our essence because we already exist. And, that's where this gets really side-splitting:

    Alfred is a character, LOL. He doesn't exist.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LOL on more levels than one, Stoppard's text is of course irredeemably taken from aspects of Sarte, and while in the original Alfred isn't a whole lot more then a very dark punch line, by specifically subverting Stoppard's text I've inadvertently stumbled upon an approach that falls back in line with the play's philosophical underpinning. Well, at least I find it dramaturgically humorous, not that my opinion is anything but biased towards my own ideas.

      Delete